This week our interview is with Polaris Library Systems, producers of the Polaris Integrated Library System, which is used by public libraries, academic libraries, and consortia throughout the U.S. and Canada. Responses were provided by Jeanne Otten, Product Analyst for Cataloging and Public Catalogs.
Question 1: Is your cataloging system current with MARC 21 updates 9, 10, and 11, which made changes to MARC to accommodate RDA? If not, do you plan to update, and do you have a timeline for updating? Have you made the changes for both bibliographic and authority records?
It was a busy day at the ALA Conference for RDA and RDA Toolkit. The U.S. Test Committee met with vendors, testers, and the public, and summarized the results of the test and the reasoning behind their recent decision. The committee stated that the "rewrite" of RDA will actually be more of a rewording, intended to simplify and clarify some of the instructions. Cataloging practice will not be affected by the rewording. We also learned that the Library of Congress will begin partial RDA cataloging in November.
Today I attended the Copy Cataloing Interest Group. It was a full room and the presentations focused on training copy catalogers in RDA. Speakers emphaszied the importance of introducing and using basic FRBR and RDA terminology to foster comfort with the new standard. While they advised against any deep dive into FRBR theory, it is clear that a grasp of the WEMI concepts and the FRBR user tasks is essential to successful training.
The two-day preconference on RDA concludes today. The first day featured four presentations covering key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2 and best practices for RDA Toolkit. One point of emphasis was the key role of workflows in maximizing the potential of RDA Toolkit. In the near future we plan to share the best practices and fresh ideas for workflows on the blog. Today's session covers cataloging electronic resources, visual materials, and nonmusical audio recordings with RDA, as well as a presentation on RDA's impact on library automation systems.
Our third vendor interview comes from BiblioMondo, a Canadian software development company whose product list includes the PortFolio and Concerto ILSs. Guillaume Freyburger, Vice-President of Strategies and Technologies, answered our questions.
Question 1: Is your cataloging system current with MARC 21 updates 9, 10, and 11, which made changes to MARC to accommodate RDA? If not, do you plan to update, and do you have a timeline for updating? Have you made the changes for both bibliographic and authority records?
As we review the Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee on the implementation of RDA and plan the next steps for RDA Toolkit, it is clear that there is one thing we can do right away to help users become as well prepared as possible for RDA implementation. And that is to extend our double-user offer.
This is the second of our series of vendor interviews. In April we surveyed RDA Toolkit users, asking which vendors they would like us to talk to regarding RDA and what sort of questions we should ask. The interview questions are derived from those posed by users. Our intention with this exercise is to both address concerns that our users have about how cataloging with RDA will actually work and to establish an avenue of communication between vendors and our users.
Last week, we introduced our MARC linking service, which described how to build links from a location in MARC (e.g. 245 00 $b) to relevant instructions in RDA. We think this service will prove very useful to vendors and users, however, there may also be times when users want to simply link to an RDA instruction without any tie to MARC mapping.
The RDA Test Coordinating Committee has recommended that the three U.S. national libraries (Library of Congress, the National Agricultural Library, and the National Library of Medicine) adopt RDA: Resource Description and Access once certain conditions are met. The implementation will begin no earlier than January 1, 2013. An executive summary of the report is available now on the NLM site.The full report and recommendation of the U.S.
This is the debut of our vendor interviews. After reviewing results of our user survey, we selected the most requested vendors and sent them a series of questions derived from those our users asked. We hope to publish the intereviews on a regular basis. And we hope that they will prove useful to RDA Toolkit's users, giving them some idea of what to expect from technical service products during the period of transition from AACR2 to RDA.
First up is Innovative Interfaces, Inc., who are best known for their Millennium ILS. The questions were answered by Ken Wells, product manager for III.
We are thrilled to announce that our MARC linking service is now available to all. The service is free of charge and will be a powerful tool for both users and vendors. Following the instructions provided, anyone will be able to create a link based on a specific location within MARC to the relevant instruction(s) in RDA Toolkit. The linking service requires URLs constructed on the record type (bibliographic or authority) and the essential MARC data--field, indicators, and subfield.
This is the first of what we plan to make a regular type of post here. "Tips in Threes" is meant to give you some "I had no idea you could do that" type of advice for getting more from your RDA Toolkit experience. Each post will include three such tips, hence the name. Why three? Well, catalogers supposedly love things in threes, right? At least before RDA came along. But mostly because three seems like a manageable number of tips resulting in a post that is rich incontent without being overwhelming. On to the tips.